Saturday, June 20, 2015

Jurassic World Review


It has been over 22 years since the release of the most iconic, endearingly entertaining survival films from Steven Spielberg was released based on Michael Crichton’s latest science disaster book called Jurassic Park.  It took the world by storm in the cinemas and made Dinosaurs into a pop culture icon forever since its release as well as being just simply cool.  After 2 sequels with Lost World: Jurassic Park being a fun yet halfhearted return to that world and Jurassic Park III being a straightforward monster film with very little redeeming qualities to it, we discontinue the idea that these films exist and jump forward into the future to fully realize Hammond’s dreams of a Dinosaur theme park in Colin Trevorrow’s survival adventure film sequel to the original film going from the name Jurassic Park to Jurassic World.  This highly anticipated sequel seems to have the exciting survival action of the original films on a larger scale as well as some really talented, proven actors helming the cast with Chris Pratt, Vincent D’Onfario, and Bryce Dallas Howard in the lead/supporting roles.  The real question is can the film recapture that sense of wonder and moral conundrum within its story to make it just as compelling as the original film with a cast of likable, down to earth characters or will it be an outlandish, cartoony take in the veins of its lesser, average sequels that have been retcon out of existence? Let’s find out by entering Jurassic World and examining what this park has to offer this time around.


The story picks up about 22 years exact after the Isla Nublar incident with the park now in full swing with Hammond’s dream fully realized as thousands of people come in to enjoy the park itself. This is where it becomes kind of messy with about 3 plot lines veining for time to be told starting with the kids Zach (Nick Robinson) and Gray (Ty Simpkins) Mitchell are sent off by their parents to spend time with their aunt Claire Dearing (Bryce Dallas Howard) who works on the island as an operations manager for CEO Simon Masrani (Irrfan Khan) owner of the new park.  The kids spend the weekend there while their parents handle a divorce while Claire is looking over a new genetically enhanced dinosaur hybrid created by geneticist Dr. Henry Wu (B.D. Wong) from the original film.  On the other side, you have Star Lord…I mean Owen Grady (Chris Pratt), Velociraptor trainer/expert being intimidated by the head of inGen Security Ops Vic Hoskins (Vincent D'Onfario) to utilized the animals as weapons that can’t be hacked or weighed down by technology (?).  That is a lot of story elements being introduced and fighting for time to be developed in its 2 hour run-time.


As you can guess, the new dinosaur named Indominus Rex breaks out of its pen and all hell breaks loose as characters fight, struggle, manipulate, and survive from a monster driven to destroy and eat everything in sight on top of other dinosaurs literally causing havoc.  A paradise gone wrong is a familiar theme to this series and if there is any complement given to the story, it would be that this film gets closer to the thriller/scientific mystery of the novel but ditching everything else including the wit, horror, and intelligent storytelling/pacing of the book and original film.  Not to mention, it completely ignores the last two films, not factoring into this film as it serves as a sequel to the original film only.  It seems to be on the right track at the start of it with the emphasis on character development, world building, and encapsulating the feels from the first film.  However, that is only for the first half of the film as the themes of genetic control and animal preservation in the face of government suits is quickly tossed aside for what this film really wants to be.
         
This is where the story becomes secondary in lieu of visually driven, tense action set pieces that toss out logic, reason, and ingenuity of character interaction and behavior that is all over the place in throughout this film.  Also, the second half of the film devolves into a straightforward monster survival film in the spirit of Jurassic Park III that ditches any of the interesting moralistic dilemmas that were concurrent in the first film and heavy handed in the second film, making it a simple, traditional action adventure film.  The original story from Michael Critchen was able to balance all of that and create a tense, thoughtful adventure about the dangers of genetic engineering without dumbing it down which is exactly what every one of these films including the first film have done making this entry kind of senseless in its purpose for existing after the first film.  The point that had to be made was that it is another amalgamation of themes, ideas, and action set pieces from the book thrown into this story with no clear sense of reason behind its inclusion for this story (genetically engineered dinosaur, militaristic purposes for the dinosaur, etc.).


Now that doesn’t mean the film is not entertaining at all since it does adhere closer to the intention and spirit of the book especially in the park being open to the public while all of the Dino-mayhem takes place killing people left and right.  It is mindlessly entertaining in the creative energy and inventive use of the creatures during the larger than life brawls which serve as the highlight of the film.  Despite the overuse of the CGI throughout the film, it is effective in giving these Dinosaurs some awe-inspiring, brutal kills especially in picking off the human characters.  As for the characters, they are about as stereotypical as you expect them to be from Grady being the badass animal hunter/trainer to the prissy, stern Dearing and Hoskins’ obsessive need for military prowess through Velociraptors trained for warfare.  The characters were very much a mixed bag of useless, annoying, unlikeable people that makes it hard for the viewers to sympathize with the humans fight to survive from the Dinosaurs when the Dinosaurs are treated like crap throughout the film and are given plenty of heart pulling manipulations to really care for their plight.  If there was a point to the kids being a major focus of the plot other than to satisfying the status quote of the original film, it was lost to me but the film relies heavily on the nostalgia factor with dozens of callback to the first film.  This is the unfortunate effects of a screenplay in the hands of 4 different points of view that muddle up a very large, encompassing story and shifts in tone happen to often as a result from exciting and tense to really uncomfortably funny and awkward in showing its humorous side.

The long emphasis on the plot, story, and character is explored for a reason as there is an enjoyable adventure film here but at the same time, it is contending with dozens of plot lines that are either underdeveloped or tossed aside for a sequel to explore (at this time, a new trilogy of Jurassic films are in development).  However, the film is quite exciting with its action and it does not disappoint in that regard from the Indominus Rex killing mercilessly the guards to the final showdown that I will leave to you to see as it is worth seeing in theaters but it does involve the Dinosaurs throwing down with each other.  You have to sit through character expositions, pointless development of said characters (the main Kid characters are the prime example of this misstep), and some really slow pacing in the middle act to get to the really cool stuff near the end after being hopeful at the careful handling of the first act. 

After dealing with that long diatribe on the plot and story components of Jurassic World, it is time to rundown the technical elements of the film from the effects to the camera work/editing as well as the art direction behind the dinosaurs and finally, the score from a well-known composer that I was quite surprised to see involved with this film.  There is an extensive use of CGI for most of the Dinosaurs featured throughout the film with very little use of practical/animatronics in only a handful of scenes.  They are very polish looking and function well enough for the action set pieces featured in the film but they lack a sense of grit and reality that the original films (the first and Lost World) were able to maintain thanks to the way it was shot, lit, and framed to take these effects into account.  It is still amazing to see how much detail and care they put into really getting these Dinosaurs to move smoothly but it does feeling mind-numbing after some time especially when the human characters are thinly written and quite unlikeable that you want those creatures to just munch on them with very little care given at all.  Anyway, the effects are refined and look great in general with the oddities and the uncanny valley seeping into the Dinosaur looks throughout the film especially with their close ups.


There seems to be a refreshing use of on-site locations and sets built to really give the place personality specifically with the park itself looking like a theme park.  The film moves at a brisk pace in the first and third act but it is the middle second act that slows it down considerably with its shift in tone and story genre really create a disjointed feeling of incoherency with the narrative plotlines.  The action set pieces are at least clear and steady throughout, allowing for the viewers to actually see the carnage taking place and it does not shy away from the fierce, hungry dinosaurs chomping at the people left and right.  It does look good with its use of HD cameras and 3D even though it only has a few screen popping effects (the ones featured in the trailer if you watched the 3D) but the locales look lovely to watch.  It seems on a technical level that the film is as polished as it gets for a modern audience with its sleek look to the park and settings as well as tense, thoughtful editing allow viewers to really absorb the entertaining action set pieces that transpires throughout this adventure. 


There is one more component of the film I really want to examine and that is the music score from none other than Michael Giachinno.  It was quite surprising to see him composing another film immediately after his latest work on Disney’s Tomorrowland.  Most of the traditional themes created by John Williams is present with some variations injected by the composer himself which works well for the most part but it can be jarring to hear the variants playing in certain parts specifically the vista shots of the park and awe-stricken scenes of the dinosaurs.  The action beats are reliable, intense, and compelling to hear, which the composer utilizes to great effect in the dinosaur attacks and the beatdown finale.  It does sound similar to his previous work particularly Mission: Impossible or Star Trek but it stills is great to hear and thankfully isn’t as generic as say some of Han Zimmer’s live action film scores.  The music works for the scenes overall and drives the action forward appropriately. 


It has been a long journey of viewpoints and reflections but to re-cap this review in general, Jurassic World is an enjoyable if mindless return to a series that has languished in limbo for close to a decade now after the fun yet pointless 3rd film in the series.  As a reboot to the series that retcons the second and third adventures into oblivion, it is surprisingly fun to watch the action set pieces especially in how fun and inventive they get as well as how brutal it becomes with the kills that occur in this film.  Where the film does not hold up in regards to quality or memorability is in its story which happens to be convoluted with numerous plot points, characters with only the simplest, story stereotypes and clichés traits developed, and the interesting themes of genetic engineering developed for only short time before being dropped completely for more Dino massacres.  This feels like two films mashed together with the first one being a thoughtful, engaging sci-fi film that really does an admirable job attempting to follow up to the first film and the other one being a straightforward monster/survival adventure made to entertain without making viewers think about the absurdity of it all.  It creates a film that is unfortunately a mess but it can be enjoyed on sheer entertainment, star power, exciting Dino-action, and actually feeling like a proper follow-up to the original film.  This is one trip that you should take but manage your expectations and you might get some enjoyment out of this film. 


Score: *** out of *****
This monster/ survival adventure reboot to a series that is 2 decades old is reliably fun to watch and quite inventive with its use of the dinosaurs especially for the exciting action set pieces that really make it worth at least one view.  The charisma of Chris Pratt’s character Tom Grady as well as the cheesy, unintentionally funny dialogue really make the film tolerable to sit through despite the lack of characterization for the majority of the cast that makes them into cartoon characters rather than rational human beings to empathize or sympathize with to care especially when they are in danger or get chomped on my dinosaurs.  The story is the biggest crutch in the enjoyment of this film as it really showcases how confused and disjointed a film can be with 4 writers at the helm with their own styles clashing with each other.  Jurassic World is a proper sequel to the original film but a very messy start to a new trilogy of films that we can only hope will improve with its upcoming sequels instead of making an even bigger mess.

Friday, June 12, 2015

Tomorrowland Review


As we progress further into the summer film season, there will be a fair share of money makers, critical darlings, and the box-office/critical failures which this next film seems to fall under for almost everyone down in the middle of the consensus with Brad Bird’s next live action adventure film for Disney called Tomorrowland.  The buzz around the film was shrouded in mystery as to what it was about and what it had to offer with its plot, performances, and visual design/effects.  It should not come as a big surprise to notice how inspired and lushly beautiful the film is with its artistic direction towards the world of Tomorrowland as well as the technology on display here.  This is even supplemented by a powerhouse cast of famous and unknown actors who really display their prowess as actors to the finest order displaying such wonderful characterization through Bird’s graceful direction to the affectionate chemistry between the lead actors that makes us root for them to success for the right reason.  With a traditional coming of age tale of good vs. evil with ambitious, lofty ideas and themes to explore, how could it ultimately end up being very lackluster in its execution and development of those interesting and confident production qualities?   Let’s find out how this adventure holds up to other films within its genre in Tomorrowland.


The best place to start with what went right and wrong with Bird’s latest adventure film is with the general gist of the narrative and how it comes together overall from the screenplay to the eventual results of the production’s interpretation of the themes in the script.  It is a coming of age story of a young teenage girl named Casey Newton (Britt Robertson) who dreams of going beyond the boundaries of our planet despite the dismantling of the NASA program with her father handling the de-construction job.  After an incident involving her attempts to keep her dream alive, she comes across a pin that transports her to a city born in the future where dreams and ideas can become a reality in a city known as Tomorrowland.  Unfortunately, this grabs the attention of an unknown shadowy group hell bent on retrieving her and her young companion named Athena (Raffey Cassidy) who guides her to an old, washed out inventor named Frank Walker (George Clooney) that used to live and work within the city of tomorrow.  They venture off onto a road-trip adventure filled with danger, intrigue, and friendship to find Tomorrowland and the secrets it holds that could very well change the world for better or worse.


That is the overall plot in a nutshell but it explores some pretty heavy themes of creativity through science, societies impassionate attitude towards ideas, and having to deal with the cynicism of a future that could be hopeful and full of wonders opposed to one filled with doubt, contempt, and no desire for change to be made within our nature.  There are expressions of noble intent towards these lofty themes especially as it smacks with Damon Lidenlof’s trademark ability to write a proper structure to building a mystery around the story but it comes with his famous flaw in many of the projects in which he is a featured writer opposite another (in this case, Brad Bird).  The payoff of this journey is considerable weak and formulaic in that it is disconnected from the first 2/3rd’s of the film by throwing in a villain whose motivation for this conflict are underdeveloped with very little purpose behind his quarrel with humanity and its ignorant nature for change.  That is not counting the numerous times the film tends to be overly preachy about its themes particularly in the beginning and final act where it has to constantly remind you of what is at stake with their journey when it is never properly developed to feel the importance of this road trip to Tomorrowland.  The overall plot is intriguing but never comes together because it juggles with too many ideas and never commits to one for the characters to fight or change throughout this journey.


However, the writing for the character interactions and development is where the story truly excels despite only half of this film devoted to this important component to writing for film.  The lead character we follow for the majority of the film Casey and she is the enthusiastic, determined hero thrust into this adventure by chance.  Her character arc is very relatable and thankfully likable thanks to the incredible performance from the actress and careful handling of her development from start to finish.  The conflicts, humor, and dramatic exchanges with her and the other characters are handled with such grace and finesse that it would not be surprising if Lindenlof handled the plot in the screenplay and Bird wrote all of the development and traits of these extremely nuanced characters.  Each character is memorable and unique to this story mainly from the truly well-defined characterization that is present in the script and direction of the actors making it the main strong point of the story despite the plot lacking some semblance of purpose and payoff to this adventure.


Thankfully, the acting talents for this film are quite strong throughout the film with a mixture of unknown and renowned actors present in this film.  We have to start with the lead Britt Robertson who truly approaches this role with such vigorous energy and capabilities to carry this film as the lead character to relate and root for throughout the adventure.  Another standout from the cast is Raffey Cassidy as the girl with a mysterious secret and persona Athena whose humorous, monotone characteristics really lead to some truly memorable character moment with her both comedic and dramatic.  As for the majority of the cast filled with recognizable stars (Hugh Laurie, etc.), they all handle their parts exceptionally well especially George Clooney as Frank Walker who actually becomes a character for once and really embodies the hardships and cynicism of the character like a pro.  The cast is fantastic overall but the script and story themes/ideas do not provide much for them to create a very humanizing face to the world the story is set in.


If there is one area where this film truly excels in besides the performances from a very well rounded cast, it is the technical areas of this film ranging from art direction to visual effects and finally another captivating score from Michael Giacchino.  The look of the city is extraordinary and the world that is fully developed in this story is very eye opening and magnificent to see in motion.  They really made Tomorrowland out to be a visually intriguing, bustling city that really feels unique in its own right in the brief scenes we get to see it in all of its glory.  The same could be said for all of the gadgets and tech used throughout the film as there is a very steam-punk/nuclear approach to the Sci-Fi elements of this film making for some really impressive, memorable set pieces to take place. It is truly a visual wonder in both its design and look to the world and technology used by the characters.


I can’t forget to mention yet another exciting, stirring score from composer Michael Giacchino who has musically composed for films like Star Trek / Into Darkness, Up, Mission: Impossible 3/Ghost Protocol, and Medal of Honor provides his usual, captivating style to this film.  It helps to drive the action forward and really capture that sense of wonder and mystery to Tomorrowland that might not have come across in lesser capable hands.  This is another fine piece of work from him that really elevates the enjoyment of the film overall and help to diminish the weakness the film which suffers from its pacing and story arcs in the screenplay.


When it comes down to it, Tomorrowland is a visual wonder in action and spectacle with an interesting, mysterious world serving as the goal for this adventure.  However, it stumbles often with the story elements from plot to character motivations despite having some truly memorable, developed characters, which are the norm when it comes to films with Brad Bird at the helm.  The action set pieces are inventive and use of the tech in this world is effectively utilized to score some genuine exciting moments as well as the stylized effects from visuals to practical and finally the uniformed designs of the city/costumes are really pleasing to the eyes.  It is the overly preachy attitudes and themes of nostalgia for optimism towards a better future and its very dark, depressing turn in the third act that really does not gel with the intentions of this film being a fun, engaging adventure.  As much as it wants to take us to another place with a brand new, unique story on a theme park ride, this is one ride that you will enjoy for what it is and completely forget about as soon as you leave the area.

Score *** out *****


Tomorrowland will be another example of what can go right and wrong with a big budget action adventure film with stunning, inspiring visual effects and design dazzling the viewers on top of the inventive, entertaining action set pieces that really maintain the energetic first two acts of the film.  This is supplemented by the strong and terrific performances from all the actors including Britt Robinson who carries the film gracefully along with George Clooney providing a cool, capable performance as the mentor in this film.  However, the preachy nature of the themes involving optimism towards ideas and a bold future as well as the dark, heavy handed turn in the 3rd act really brings down the enjoyment of the film and it results in a payoff that is very anticlimactic with that can be downtrodden and pessimistic at times.  This is a relatively fun enjoyable family adventure film that is both marvelously on a performance and technical level but it is a bit forgettable as a result from its very straightforward, heavy handed story-line and conflicting tones in the themes it explores.